IMAC Review is a peer-reviewed law journal committed to advancing scholarship and professional discourse on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in accordance with international standards and academic practices. The journal serves as a scholarly platform for academics, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to critically examine developments in mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and other ADR mechanisms at national and international levels. Through rigorous research and ethical scholarship, IMAC Review promotes comparative analysis, institutional reforms, and policy-oriented dialogue aimed at strengthening efficient, accessible, and globally aligned dispute resolution frameworks.
IMAC Review is a peer-reviewed law journal committed to advancing scholarship and professional discourse on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in accordance with international standards and academic practices. The journal serves as a scholarly platform for academics, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to critically examine developments in mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and other ADR mechanisms at national and international levels. Through rigorous research and ethical scholarship, IMAC Review promotes comparative analysis, institutional reforms, and policy-oriented dialogue aimed at strengthening efficient, accessible, and globally aligned dispute resolution frameworks.
Double-blind peer review ensuring academic originality.
Freely accessible research to promote wider dissemination.
Managed by experienced legal scholars and professionals with relevant expertise.
IMAC Review welcomes original research articles, case comments, legislative analyses, policy papers, and book reviews that advance informed discourse and practical reform in the field of Alternative Dispute Resolution through Mediation and Arbitration.
As a scholarly platform, IMAC Review brings together academics, judges, legal practitioners, arbitrators, mediators, policymakers, and researchers to critically examine contemporary developments in national and international dispute resolution frameworks. The Journal encourages comparative legal analysis, institutional innovation, procedural reforms, and theoretical contributions that enhance efficiency, fairness, and accessibility in the administration of justice.
Where Innovation Meets Integrity in Alternative Dispute Resolution Research
Double-blind peer review ensuring academic rigor, originality, and impartial evaluation.
Strict policies on plagiarism, research ethics, authorship, and conflict of interest.
Managed by experienced legal scholars and professionals with relevant expertise.
Digital archiving to ensure long-term accessibility and visibility.
Clear copyright ownership and licensing terms for authors and readers.
With a structured editorial workflow and digital accessibility, IMAC Review ensures efficient review timelines.
Submit your manuscript to IMAC Review through our online OJS system by following a simple, transparent, and structured submission process designed for academic excellence.
Create an author account through the journal’s online submission system (OJS) by completing the registration form and selecting the role of Author.
Format your manuscript according to the journal template, ensure anonymization for double-blind review, and verify compliance with plagiarism and ethical standards.
Log in to your account and click “New Submission” in the OJS dashboard. Complete all required metadata fields, including title, abstract, keywords, and author details.
Upload the main manuscript file along with any supplementary documents such as cover letter, declaration of originality, figures, or data files.
Review & confirm your submission. Authors can track the manuscript status through the OJS dashboard during all stages of review.
IMAC Review aims to contribute meaningfully to strengthen rule of law values, and support the harmonization of dispute resolution practices at both domestic and international levels.
Copyright © 2025 IMAC Review