1. Introduction
Editors are responsible for upholding the academic standards, integrity, and ethical principles of IMAC Review. Their duties span from initial manuscript assessment to final publication decisions. Editors must act independently, without influence from financial, political, or personal interests.
2. Editorial Responsibilities
Editors are expected to:
-
Ensure manuscripts align with the journal’s scope and standards.
-
Conduct initial screening for originality, ethical compliance, and quality.
-
Assign manuscripts to appropriate reviewers with relevant expertise.
-
Oversee the peer review process, ensuring fairness and timeliness.
-
Make final publication decisions based solely on academic merit and ethical considerations.
-
Maintain confidentiality for all submissions.
-
Handle conflict of interest among authors, reviewers, or themselves.
3. Initial Manuscript Screening
Editors should:
-
Verify compliance with author guidelines (format, citation, structure).
-
Ensure manuscripts are original and free of plagiarism.
-
Check for ethical compliance, including human subjects approval if applicable.
-
Desk-reject manuscripts that clearly fall outside the journal’s scope or standards.
4. Reviewer Assignment
Editors must:
-
Select at least two qualified independent reviewers for each manuscript.
-
Avoid assigning reviewers with conflicts of interest.
-
Ensure the review process is double-blind.
5. Decision-Making
Based on reviewer reports, editors may:
-
Accept the manuscript without revision
-
Request minor revisions
-
Request major revisions
-
Reject the manuscript
All decisions must be documented in the OJS system.
6. Ethical Oversight
Editors must ensure that:
-
All published work adheres to ethical standards set by COPE.
-
Plagiarism or duplicate submission issues are addressed promptly.
-
Retractions, corrections, and expressions of concern are issued when necessary.
7. Conflict of Interest
Editors must recuse themselves from handling any manuscript where a personal, institutional, or financial conflict exists. An alternate editor should be assigned.
8. Appeals and Complaints
Editors are responsible for:
-
Handling appeals from authors regarding rejection decisions.
-
Maintaining transparency and fairness during the appeals process.
-
Communicating decisions clearly and promptly.
9. Editorial Independence
Editors must remain independent of commercial, political, or personal influence. Payment of APCs does not influence editorial decisions.