logo
Edit Content
logo

IMAC Review is a peer-reviewed law journal committed to advancing scholarship and professional discourse on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in accordance with international standards and academic practices. The journal serves as a scholarly platform for academics, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to critically examine developments in mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and other ADR mechanisms at national and international levels. Through rigorous research and ethical scholarship, IMAC Review promotes comparative analysis, institutional reforms, and policy-oriented dialogue aimed at strengthening efficient, accessible, and globally aligned dispute resolution frameworks.

Correction Policy

IMAC Review is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, and transparency of the scholarly record. In accordance with international publishing standards, the journal provides a clear mechanism for correcting errors in published content.

1. General Principles

The journal follows best practices in publication ethics and ensures that any necessary corrections are made promptly, transparently, and in a manner that preserves the integrity of the academic record.

Corrections may be issued when errors are identified by authors, readers, editors, or reviewers.

2. Types of Post-Publication Notices

IMAC Review may publish the following types of notices:

a) Erratum

Issued when a significant error originates from the journal’s editorial or production process (e.g., formatting, typesetting, metadata errors).

b) Corrigendum

Issued when an author identifies an error in the published article that does not invalidate the findings but requires formal correction.

c) Addendum

Published when additional information is necessary to clarify or update the article without altering its conclusions.

d) Retraction

Issued when the findings are unreliable due to misconduct, major error, plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unethical research practices.

e) Expression of Concern

Published when serious concerns are raised about an article, but an investigation is ongoing and a final decision has not yet been made.

3. Correction Procedure

When an error is reported:

  1. The editorial office acknowledges receipt of the complaint.

  2. The Editor-in-Chief reviews the matter, and if necessary, consults reviewers or subject experts.

  3. Authors are contacted for clarification where applicable.

  4. A decision is made regarding the appropriate course of action.

  5. The correction notice is published in the next available issue and linked to the original article.

All correction notices will:

  • Clearly identify the original article

  • State the nature of the correction

  • Be permanently linked to the original publication

  • Maintain transparency without removing the original record (except in extreme cases)

4. Article Updates

Minor typographical or formatting errors that do not affect the meaning, interpretation, or conclusions of the article may be corrected without issuing a formal notice. However, the date of correction may be recorded for transparency.

5. Retraction Policy

Retractions will be clearly marked and remain publicly accessible. The original article will not be removed but will be watermarked or labeled as “Retracted” to preserve the scholarly record.

Retraction decisions are made in accordance with international ethical standards and due process.

6. Author Responsibility

Authors are responsible for promptly notifying the journal if a significant error is discovered in their published work.

7. Editorial Integrity

All correction decisions are made independently of financial considerations and are based solely on academic and ethical standards.

logo

IMAC Review aims to contribute meaningfully to strengthen rule of law values, and support the harmonization of dispute resolution practices at both domestic and international levels. 

Contact Us