Reforming International Commercial Arbitration in Emerging Economies: Lessons from Cross-Border Enforcement Practices

This article critically examines the evolving framework of international commercial arbitration in emerging economies, with particular focus on cross-border enforcement challenges. Drawing upon comparative analysis of arbitral practices in South Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, the study evaluates procedural inefficiencies, judicial intervention trends, and enforcement barriers under the New York Convention regime.

The article argues that while emerging jurisdictions increasingly adopt modern arbitration statutes, practical enforcement challenges persist due to inconsistent judicial interpretation and procedural delays. By analyzing legislative reforms and landmark enforcement cases, the study proposes a harmonized model emphasizing judicial restraint, institutional strengthening, and procedural clarity. The findings aim to contribute to ongoing reform debates within arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) systems globally.